In a developing controversy, Attorney Manoj Gamage has accused Sri Lanka’s Presidential Media Division (PMD) of issuing a misleading statement about former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s security arrangements. Gamage claims that despite PMD’s public denial of any reduction, official records show that Rajapaksa’s security has indeed been scaled back—a decision met with significant public backlash.
The allegations surfaced at a press conference in Colombo, where Gamage detailed the alleged discrepancies. Following initial reports about Rajapaksa’s reduced security, PMD released a statement denying these changes and asserting that future security decisions would be guided by recommendations from the Bureaucracy Assignment Committee responsible for VIP security. Gamage, however, points to an official letter dated October 31, 2024, signed by DIG D.V.P. Ajith Hesiri from the Special Security Directorate. In this letter, addressed to the Retired President’s Security Division, the DIG reportedly confirms the decision to reduce security was indeed made by the Bureaucracy Assignment Committee.
The PMD’s denial has raised questions about the accuracy and transparency of official communications. Gamage emphasized the need for an immediate clarification from the government, noting that one of the two documents—the letter from the DIG or the PMD’s announcement—contains false information. The attorney also stated that this situation could erode public trust if not adequately addressed.
JVP politician Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa had previously confirmed the security adjustment, noting that Rajapaksa’s protection level has been adjusted to match that of NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake. However, Gamage argued that the comparison overlooks key differences in threat levels. He pointed out that Rajapaksa’s role in ending the LTTE-led civil conflict has made him a target of various groups, and he requires heightened security measures.
According to Gamage, Rajapaksa’s security detail has been significantly pared down to one three-wheeler, two jeeps, two motorcycles, and 60 personnel. However, he claims that this figure of 60 includes drivers, clerks, and administrative staff, reducing the number of actual security officers to fewer than 20 per shift—a level he considers insufficient for someone of Rajapaksa’s profile.
Additionally, Gamage questioned the legitimacy of the PMD’s announcement, noting it lacked a signature from any responsible official. He urged the government to provide transparency on the reasons behind the security reductions, stating that arbitrary decisions on VIP security could set a troubling precedent. The lawyer also referenced Rajapaksa’s status as a former president who led the nation through a historic conflict, suggesting that his contributions warrant due protection and respect.
The controversy has sparked a broader public debate on the transparency of government actions and the potential risks for high-profile figures in Sri Lanka. Many have called on the government to release an official statement clarifying the security decision process and the current status of Rajapaksa’s protection.
