A cancelled lecture at two of the world’s most prestigious universities has sparked debate over free speech, political pressure and the limits of democratic engagement.
Namal Rajapaksa, National Organizer of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna, has issued a formal statement addressing his inability to attend scheduled engagements at the Oxford Society and the Cambridge Society. The controversy has ignited discussion around academic freedom, political dialogue, and the role of organized pressure in university forums.
The traditions of the Oxford Society and the Cambridge Society have, for generations, represented the highest ideals of free inquiry, debate and courage.
Speakers invited to these historic forums are expected to confront difficult questions, defend their views and engage with opposing viewpoints in front of an intelligent and critical audience. I had hoped to attend and accepted the invitation unconditionally, with all due respect.
It is regrettable that these lectures and discussion sessions have had to be curtailed due to pressure from organized groups. Addressing through discussion rather than obstruction will demonstrate to society that the exchange of ideas through reason is more important than silencing through intimidation.
I would like to make it clear that I welcome the opportunity to directly engage with critics, including those who strongly oppose my views, as meaningful reconciliation and progress can only occur when different perspectives are met in open dialogue. Denying such engagement and opportunity does not strengthen democracy. Replacing engagement with division without debate is weakness.
I express my gratitude to both unions for their invitation and understand the difficult situation they faced. I hope that we will have the opportunity to meet in the future in a forum that encourages dialogue.
