Former U.S. President Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell and late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein pose in this handout image released from Epstein's estate by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee in Washington, D.C., U.S., on December 12, 2025. House Oversight Committee Democrats/Handout via REUTERS. THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY
By Jonathan Ferreira
A key United States congressional committee has voted to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress after they declined to comply with subpoenas linked to the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Republican controlled House Oversight Committee approved the motion with the backing of several Democratic members and the decision will now move to the full House of Representatives for consideration. If the House supports the measure the case would be referred to the Department of Justice for review and possible action.
The committee had sought testimony from both Clintons regarding their past associations with Epstein who died in custody in twenty nineteen. Bill Clinton has previously acknowledged meeting Epstein but has consistently denied any knowledge of his criminal activities and has not been accused of wrongdoing by survivors. Lawyers representing the Clintons argued that the subpoenas were unenforceable and said their clients had already shared all limited information available to them. Despite this nine Democrats joined Republicans in voting to hold Bill Clinton in contempt while three Democrats supported a similar move against Hillary Clinton.
If approved by the full House the Justice Department would decide whether to pursue charges which carry potential penalties including a fine and up to one year in prison. Oversight Committee chairman James Comer said the vote sent a clear signal that no individual is above the law regardless of status or influence. The Clintons legal team has maintained that the investigation is politically motivated and lacks a legitimate legislative purpose. Meanwhile the release of Epstein related documents has raised further scrutiny with many records still unreleased or heavily redacted despite legal requirements. Officials say millions of documents remain outstanding as pressure mounts for greater transparency.
