In a striking demonstration of unity, seven Provincial Unions of Sri Lanka Rugby (SLR) have successfully secured a stay order, preventing the Ministry of Sports from proceeding with proposed amendments to the SLR constitution. These amendments were set to be a key part of the Special General Meeting (SGM) agenda on July 15, 2024. The writ application, numbered 438/2024, was filed on July 6, 2024, and reviewed by the Court of Appeal on July 10, 2024.
The Provincial Unions have clarified that they do not object to the conducting of the Special Annual General Meeting which is scheduled to take place on the 15th of July 2024. Their contention lies with the process of amending the constitution, a matter listed for discussion on the agenda, which they argue should adhere to proper protocols and policies. They express concern over World Rugby’s undue pressure on SLR, particularly favoring ‘A’ Division Clubs and threatening suspension, a move seen as heavy-handed and poorly executed by World Rugby representative David Carrigy during his recent fact-finding mission in Sri Lanka.
A senior rugby official from the Western Province Rugby Football Union stated, “We are not against amending the SLR constitution for the greater good of the sport. However, it’s the manner in how we are being pushed to do it that is upsetting. We want the AGM to be held and also for Minister Harin Fernando to hand over the reins of SLR to its elected Executive Committee.”
Provincial Unions Stand Firm
The Provincial Unions’ position deserves recognition. They advocate for an inclusive process for constitutional changes, beginning within SLR, moving to the SLR Council, and finally involving the respective clubs. This ensures that all stakeholders are heard and that changes are not imposed by external forces.
Minister of Sports Harin Fernando is urged to exercise caution. His attempts to impose political influence on sports administration can be detrimental. Such interference often violates the Olympic Charter, undermining the integrity and independence of sports organizations.
Blunders and Accountability
David Carrigy of World Rugby seemed more focused on addressing the grievances of ‘A’ Division Clubs rather than engaging with SLR members comprehensively. His approach bypassed the proper channels, disregarding that club memberships fall under their respective Provincial Unions, which are the actual members of SLR. This approach fosters division rather than unity.
Moreover, the Ministry of Sports’ suspension of SLR, coinciding with Carrigy’s visit, further fueled suspicions of political maneuvering. The Provincial Unions correctly emphasize that constitutional amendments should be carefully reviewed and not hastily implemented under pressure.
The Way Forward
While open to recommendations, the Provincial Unions firmly reject any form of coercion from ‘A’ Division Clubs or World Rugby. They advocate for a comprehensive review before any changes are made.
They claim to be in support of conducting the AGM and are committed to ensuring good governance, accountability, and transparency within SLR. They propose forming a three-member independent committee of retired judges and legal experts in rugby to study the recommendations and provide balanced solutions.
They believe that the current recommendations disproportionately strips power from the Provincial Unions and gives it to the clubs and claim that it is crucial to recognize the fact that the Provincial Unions play a significant role in developing rugby at all levels, from youth to national teams, while clubs mainly participate in limited tournaments.
The court of public opinion believes that the Provincial Unions’ stand is both firm and justified. Sports Minister Harin Fernando should respect their autonomy and avoid overstepping boundaries that could undermine the sport’s governance and integrity.
