Judges’ retirement age could rise by two years as the government advances a constitutional amendment despite strong legal-sector opposition.
The government is moving ahead with the judges’ retirement age extension despite opposition from lawyers, civil society organisations and political parties.
The proposed constitutional amendment would raise the retirement age of Supreme Court judges from 65 to 67. It would also increase the Court of Appeal retirement age from 63 to 65.
According to reports, officials submitted a concept paper covering the proposed changes to the latest Cabinet meeting. The government now plans to accelerate the amendment process as previously decided.
Government Defends Judges’ Retirement Age Proposal
Cabinet Spokesperson Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa said discussions about extending judges’ service had continued for some time. The issue had received attention in society and at parliamentary committee level.
He also noted that other sectors, including health and public administration, had requested similar service extensions.
The government says the proposal aims to speed up the hearing of pending cases. It also seeks to provide relief to the public and strengthen confidence in the judiciary and the law.
Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs Attorney Sunil Watagala addressed the issue in Parliament yesterday.
He said the government was considering the judicial system’s practical requirements. He also highlighted the importance of retaining the knowledge and service of experienced senior judges.
According to the government, senior judicial experience remains important for complex legal proceedings. This includes trials involving alleged large-scale corruption and fraud under previous administrations.
Officials argue that extending service would help those proceedings continue without disruption.
Legal Groups Warn of Threat to Judicial Independence
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka has strongly opposed the proposed amendment.
Civil society organisations, including the Centre for Policy Alternatives, and opposition political parties have also raised objections.
Critics argue that the constitutional change could weaken judicial independence. They also warn that it may disrupt promotions traditionally determined through seniority.
However, the government rejects claims that the proposal targets or benefits particular individuals.
It maintains that the amendment represents a structural reform intended to improve the efficiency of the entire judicial system.
The government also says the change would allow Sri Lanka to benefit from experienced judges for two additional years.
Despite continuing criticism, the administration appears determined to proceed with the judges’ retirement age amendment and place the proposal before the required constitutional process.
