Sri Lanka economic recovery has restored stability, but Montek Singh Ahluwalia warns structural reforms are now vital to unlock lasting growth.
Sri Lanka economic recovery has cleared its first major hurdle by restoring macroeconomic stability, but the more difficult challenge of creating sustained growth now begins.
That was the central warning from former Planning Commission of India Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia. He argued that stabilising an economy after a crisis does not automatically produce long-term recovery.
Instead, stability creates the foundation for a more politically difficult period of structural reform.
Speaking at the “India Calling” forum organised by the Lanka India Business Association, Ahluwalia drew heavily on India’s own reform experience. He said countries emerging from crises often struggle once fiscal and monetary conditions begin to improve.
Get Breaking News First
on WhatsApp
Sri Lanka Economic Recovery Needs Structural Reform
“The return of macro stability in Sri Lanka is not in doubt,” Ahluwalia said. “But you have a much bigger challenge now, which is, what about structural reforms for growth?”
He stressed that the next phase should focus on productivity, investment and removing barriers that discourage businesses from expanding.
According to Ahluwalia, Sri Lanka’s future success will depend less on headline economic indicators and more on whether domestic businesses regain enough confidence to invest.
He identified weak private investment as a particular concern.
“Foreign direct investment is more likely to come in if domestic private investment goes up,” he said. Overseas investors often treat stronger local investment as evidence that businesses inside the country have confidence in the economy.
The World Bank has similarly emphasised private-sector-led growth, stronger competitiveness and reforms that improve Sri Lanka’s business environment.
Political Consensus Will Decide Reform Success
Ahluwalia warned that structural reform cannot succeed through economics alone.
Reforms inevitably create winners and losers because they redistribute costs, opportunities and benefits across society.
Drawing on India’s experience, he argued that reforms tend to last longer when they emerge through domestic debate. They become politically weaker when citizens believe outside institutions have imposed them.
Sri Lanka’s ongoing IMF-supported programme remains important to maintaining international credibility. The IMF said in April that the economy grew 5% in 2025, while official reserves reached US$7 billion by the end of March 2026.
However, the IMF has also stressed that further structural reforms are required to improve the investment climate and raise Sri Lanka’s growth potential. It identified gaps in trade liberalisation, labour-market flexibility, business regulation, digitalisation and infrastructure efficiency.
Ahluwalia urged Sri Lanka to identify a limited number of critical reforms and pursue them consistently over the next five to 10 years.
Priority areas include land access, labour regulation, infrastructure financing, business rules and trade competitiveness.
The message for Sri Lanka economic recovery is therefore straightforward. Stabilisation prevented a deeper collapse, but it cannot by itself deliver prosperity.
The harder task now is building political and public agreement around reforms capable of turning restored stability into stronger investment, productivity and sustainable long-term growth.
