A fierce media standoff unfolds as Hiru TV rejects compensation demands, admits technical errors, and challenges Lal Kantha’s claims while vowing to defend media freedom in court.
Asia Broadcasting Corporation, the parent company of Hiru TV, has strongly responded to a letter of demand issued over a recently broadcast news report, firmly stating that no compensation will be paid and inviting the aggrieved party to pursue legal action if necessary. The media network clarified that while a technical error had occurred in the reporting, it was promptly corrected and carried no malicious intent.
According to a formal communication sent by Sudath Perera Associates, Attorneys-at-Law, a calculation error was identified in the statistics related to the asset and liability declaration mentioned in the news item aired on April 16. Upon discovering the mistake, the organization took immediate corrective action, issuing public clarifications across all its platforms, including Hiru TV, Hiru FM, Sha FM, and associated social media channels, on April 18.
The legal representatives emphasized that the news report was not intended to defame or harm any individual. They noted that once the oversight was recognized, the network voluntarily issued an apology and ensured that accurate information was communicated to the public. Based on these actions, the organization maintains that it is not legally obligated to pay any damages as demanded.
In a further development, the attorneys have raised concerns regarding the legality of the asset and liability declaration submitted by Lal Kantha under the Anti-Corruption Act No. 09 of 2023, alleging that the document contains significant discrepancies and procedural defects.
The response also takes a more aggressive stance, asserting that Lal Kantha, due to his own publicly admitted actions involving damage to public property and incitement of unrest, lacks the level of reputation required to claim defamation. The legal team stated that this position will be strongly argued in court if the matter proceeds to litigation.
Additionally, the letter warns against any attempts to interfere with the broadcasting rights of the Hiru Media Network, making it clear that legal action will be initiated against any such moves. The attorneys further indicated that action could also be taken against the Minister for alleged violations of constitutional provisions.
Reaffirming its position, the law firm representing the network stressed that it will firmly resist any pressure or attempts that undermine media freedom, editorial independence, and broadcasting regulations, signaling that the dispute may escalate into a significant legal and media confrontation.
